Totally mouse power can not be less then 0,1 watt.Ī wired mouse power typically 0,1 - 0,2 Watt.Īll ok, the wired mouse is more powerfull then bluetooth module (separettly). I think the controller power can be ignored. The wire mouse is - 1.controller + 2.camera + 3.led.

For broadband Internet access it blows the other protocols out of the water.The WT12-A-AI5 (I found the datasheet) current is 31,5mA (Data transmitted 115200bps) * 3,6v. It's fast and flexbile, but also requires a lot of power. We're all pretty familiar with what purpose it's best for: Internet(!).

WiFi is probably the most familiar of these four wireless protocols. BLE can't compete with ZigBee in terms of network size, but for single device-to-device connectivity it's very comparable. In this way it can compete with Zigbee for battery life. These networks might have dozens of wireless nodes, which are only sparsely active and never have to send a lot of data.īLE combines the convenience of classic Bluetooth, and adds significantly lower power consumption. ZigBee is often a good choice for monitoring networks - like home automation projects. It also boasts a typically more convenient connection process than its competitors (ZigBee specifically). Nameīluetooth isn't the best choice for every wireless job out there, but it does excel at short-range cable-replacement-type applications. We'll include BLE as a separate entity from Classic Bluetooth. So what makes Bluetooth different from the rest of the wireless data transmission protocols out there? Or maybe you've even played with ZigBees or XBees. You might be reading this tutorial over a WiFi network. Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Pin It Wireless Comparisonīluetooth is far from the only wireless protocol out there.

Power consumption wifi vs bluetooth